Everything about Exit Poll totally explained
An
exit poll is a poll of voters taken immediately after they've exited the polling stations. Unlike an
opinion poll, which asks who the voter plans to vote for or some similar formulation, an exit poll asks who the voter actually voted for. A similar poll conducted before actual voters have voted is called an
entrance poll. Pollsters - usually private companies working for
newspapers or broadcasters - conduct exit polls to gain an early indication as to how an election has turned out, as in many elections the actual result may take hours or even days to count.
Purpose
Exit polls are also used to collect
demographic data about voters and to find out why they voted as they did. Since actual votes are cast anonymously, polling is the only way of collecting this information.
Exit polls have historically and throughout the world been used as a check against and rough indicator of the degree of
election fraud. Some examples of this include the
Venezuelan recall referendum, 2004, the
Ukrainian presidential election, 2004, and the
U.S. presidential election, 2004.
Problems
Like all opinion polls, exit polls by nature do include a
margin of error. A famous example of exit poll error occurred in the
1992 UK General Election, when two exit polls predicted a
hung parliament. The actual vote revealed that
Conservative Party Government under
John Major held their position, though with a significantly reduced majority.
A more fundamental statistical problem with exit polls is selection bias. The polls, though typically much larger than regular opinion polls, still sample only a small fraction of voters. In a heterogeneous population, sloppy selection of the sample can tilt results to any direction. This pitfall can be avoided if the polling organization is competent enough. However, there are problems more inherent to the nature of exit polls. Since the clients (the media) want to publicize results as soon as the real polls close, exit polls must close a few hours earlier. Therefore, late-hour voters are not sampled at all. Some constituents tend to vote early, for example the elderly and stay-at-home mothers, and are oversampled in the exit polls. Other constituents tend to vote late and are under-sampled. This may be the explanation for the 2004 US presidential election discrepancy between early exit polls indicating a Kerry victory, and the final outcome. Additionally, voters may be more or less willing to participate in the exit polls, or more or less willing to sabotage the poll by providing a false vote, depending on their political tendency. This is known as nonresponse and response bias, respectively.
Criticism
Widespread criticism of exit polling has occurred in cases, especially in the
United States of America, where exit-poll results have appeared and/or have provided a basis for projecting winners before all real polls have closed, thereby possibly influencing election results. In the
1980 U.S. presidential election, NBC predicted a victory for Ronald Reagan at 8:15 pm EST, based on exit polls of 20,000 voters. It was 5:15 pm on the West Coast, and the polls were still open. There was speculation that voters stayed away after hearing the results. Thereafter, television networks voluntarily adopted a course of not projecting the presidential victor until after polls closed in the West, Hawaii and Alaska excluded. In the
2000 U.S. Presidential election it was alleged that media organizations released exit poll results for
Florida before the polls closed in the Florida panhandle.
Leaks of exit poll figures for the
2004 presidential election, mainly via the
Internet, appeared to indicate a victory for
John Kerry. The
discrepancies between the exit poll data and the vote count that were outside of the margin of error, coupled with irregularities in the election which seem to explain the discrepancies and what many perceive as
evasive tactics by the polling companies, have shed doubt on the legitimacy of that election amongst political activists and some government officials.
(See 2004 United States election voting controversies for more detail.)
Some countries, such as the
United Kingdom or
Germany, have made it a criminal offence to release exit poll figures before the polling stations have closed, while others, such as
New Zealand and
Singapore, have banned them altogether. In some instances, problems with exit polls have encouraged polling groups to pool data in hopes of increased accuracy. This proved successful during the
2005 UK General Election, when the BBC and ITV merged their data to show an exit poll giving
Labour a majority of 66 seats, which turned out to be the exact figure. This method was also successful in the
2007 Australian Federal Election, where the collaboration of
Sky News,
Channel 7 and
Auspoll provided an almost exact 53 percent two party-preferred victory to
Labor over the ruling
Coalition.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Exit Poll'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://exit_poll.totallyexplained.com">Exit poll Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |